Formation of Problems of Giftedness and Talent in Ukrainian Philosophical Humanism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63437/3083-6433-2025-1(34)-04Keywords:
creativity, giftedness, talent, humanism, person, knowledgeAbstract
The article considers the problem of the formation of the idea of giftedness and talent in Ukrainian
philosophy during the Renaissance and Reformation. It is shown that the spread of ideas about a creative,
active person was facilitated by the socio-economic progress that began in Ukraine during this period and
conditioned the development of national consciousness, education and science. It is emphasized that the
sources of the formation of ideas about a creative personality should be sought in the time when the process of
the cultural revolution began to unfold on the territory of the ancient Ukrainian state. For the formation of the
philosophical thought of Kyivan Rus, its appeal to Hellenic and Byzantine worldview values and intellectual
ideas was of great importance. It is noted that a characteristic feature of Kyivan Rus’ philosophical thought is
the non-perception of the logical-discursive way of thinking characteristic of Western European scholasticism.
The affirmation of the principles of goodness, mercy and peace in Kyivan Rus’ society actualizes the problem
of recognizing the originality of gifted and talented individuals as leaders of cultural progress. It is shown
that the idea of giftedness and talent are consonant with the doctrine of apophatism, which asserts the idea of
the possibility of knowledge through mystical unity with divine forces. It is substantiated that the development
of philosophical thought in Ukraine during the Renaissance is based on the ideology of humanism, due to
which the center of “gravity” from ideas about the world is transferred to the study of man, his potentialities,
among which giftedness and talent occupy one of the most important places. It is shown that domestic thinkers,
relying on the achievements of their predecessors, develop the ideas of humanistic anthropocentrism with its
interpretation of man as the highest value, occupying an intermediate position between the sphere of spirit and
matter, belonging to two worlds – earthly and heavenly
Downloads
References
Використані літературні джерела
1. Бичко А., Бичко І. Кордоцентрично-бароковий контекст української філософії: феномен Сковороди. Сковорода Григорій: ідейна спадщина і сучасність. Київ: Інститут філософії НАН України, 2003. С. 51–78.
2. Бичко І. В. Поняття Кризи в історії філософії. Цивілізація на роздоріжжі: Пошуки філософсько-світоглядних орієнтирів. Київ: Заповіт, 1998. С. 66–69.
3. Гуссерль Е. Криза європейського людства і філософія. Сучасна зарубіжна філософія. Течії і напрями: Хрестоматія. Київ: Ваклер, 1996. С. 62–94.
4. Ільїн В. В. Діалог «Софії» і «Логосу» (феноменологія екзистенціально-персоналістських інтенцій української філософської антропології). Київ: Сталь, 2002. 288 с.
5. Лисяк-Рудницький І. Історичні есе: В 2 т. Київ: Світоч, 1994. Т. 2. 264 с.
6. Сартр Ж.-П. Буття і ніщо. Нарис феноменологічної онтології. Сучасна зарубіжна філософія. Течії і напрями. Хрестоматія. Київ: Ваклер, 1996. С. 113–182.
7. Чижевський Д. І. Нариси з історії філософії на Україні. Київ: Кобза, Орій, 1992. 230 с.
References
1. Bychko, A., & Bychko, I. (2003). Kontsentrychno-barokovyy kontekst ukrayinskoyi filosofiyi: fenomen Skovorody [Concentric-Baroque Context of Ukrainian Philosophy: The Skovoroda Phenomenon]. Kyiv. 51–78. [in Ukrainian].
2. Bychko, I.V. (1998). Ponyattya Kryzy v istoriyi filosofiyi [The Concept of Crisis in the History of Philosophy] Civilization at the Crossroads: The Search for Philosophical and Worldview Guidelines]. Kyiv. 66–69. [in Ukrainian].
3. Husserl, E. (1996). Kryza yevropeyskoho lyudstva i filosofiya [The Crisis of European Humanity and Philosophy]. Kyiv. 62–94. [in Ukrainian].
4. Ilyin, V.V. (2002). Dialoh «Sofiyi» i «Lohosu» (fenomenolohiya ekzystentsialno-personalist·skykh intentsiy ukrayinskoyi filosofskoyi antropolohiyi) [Dialogue between "Sophia" and "Logos" (phenomenology of existential-personalist intentions of Ukrainian philosophical anthropology)]. Kyiv. 288 р. [in Ukrainian].
5. Lysyak-Rudnytskyy, I. (1994). Istorychni ese [Historical essays]. Kyiv. 264 р.
6. Sartr, ZH.-P. (1996). Buttya i nishcho. Narys fenomenolohichnoyi ontolohiyi [Being and Nothingness. An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology]. Kyiv. Р. 113–182.
7. Chyzhevsskyy, D. (1992). Narysy z istoriyi filosofiyi na Ukrayiny [Essays on the History of Philosophy of Ukraine]. Kyiv. 286 р. [in Ukrainian].
