STEM(STEAM) and Logotherapy: Intersection of Dimensional Onlogoby and Multidimensionality of Scientific Education (and their Acute Relevance in the Context of War)

Authors

  • Milena Milenina Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32405/2413-4139-2020-2(29)-112-117

Keywords:

logotherapy, existential analysis, Viktor Frankl, dimensional ontology, noetic, STEM education, education during the war

Abstract

The events of the last year in Ukraine against the background of the military invasion of the Russian 
Federation have put the Ukrainian people in front of many challenges, the answers to which must be sought 
in the context of crisis situations in all spheres of life, including education. Ever since the pandemic, reality 
has been constantly and rapidly changing, calling for rapid adaptation. For these changes to consider the 
unpredictability of the future, in our opinion, we should rely on values that stand above such temporary 
concepts as war, crisis, survival, lack of resources, fear of death, any loss, etc. For this, in each of the spheres 
of human existence – from the microcosm of the family to global transformations at the level of the state and 
the world as a whole – we must be guided by a map of values that considers a person not only in the dimension 
of psychophysical, manifested being, but primarily at the level of the unmanifested, eternal one –  in the 
dimension of the noetic.  The noetic level allows one to rise above the multidirectionality and unpredictability 
of both human psychophysics and any events unfolding around. The inclusion of the noetic dimension in the 
understanding of human ontology has been tested by events that, unfortunately, have not remained forever 
in the past, but are unfolding here and now on the territory of Ukraine, namely the Second World War and 
the Auschwitz camps. Logotherapy, a direction in psychology originated there, was started by the Austrian 
psychiatrist and concentration camp prisoner Viktor Frankl, which is based on a detailed theory of existential 
analysis and understanding that mental and physical a person possesses, while the spiritual, or noetic, he is. 
This allows him to stand up to any, even contradictory, psycho-physical differences, discover self-distancing 
and self-transcendence in himself, and reconcile even the most intolerable realities of his existence into a 
whole. 
We propose to consider the principles and laws of dimensional ontology, which is the foundation of 
logotherapy, in the context of education. In particular, in our opinion, enriching educational programs with 
tools and approaches that affirm the principles of noetic will contribute to the development and strengthening 
of this dimension both in each individual and in the growing generation. Which, in turn, will make it possible 
to raise a generation of individuals, free from survival strategies and aimed at affirming values that are not 
subject to war, fear of death, or any destruction. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Adler, A. (2007). The science of living. New York, NY: Meredith Press.

2. Frankl, V. E. (1967). Psychotherapy and existentialism: Selected papers on logotherapy. New York,

NY: Washington Square Press, Inc. DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087982.

3. Frankl, V. E. (1986). The doctor and the soul: From psychotherapy to logotherapy. New York.

4. Frankl, V. E. (1990). Chelovek v poiskah smysla: Sbornik [Man’s search for meaning: Selected

works]. Moscow. [in Russian].

5. Frankl, V. E. (2014). The will to meaning: Foundations and applications of logotherapy. New York.

6. Freud, S. (1963a). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis (pts. 1 & 2). In J. Strachey (Ed. &

Trans.). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 15, P. 1–242. London.

7. Freud, S. (1963b). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis (pt. 3). In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.). The

standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 16, P. 243–483. London.

8. Freud, S. (1964). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis and other works. In J. Strachey (Ed.).

The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 21, P. 1–184. Londons.

9. Fromm, E. (1942). Fear of freedom.London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd.

10. Fromm, E. (1947). Man for himself. An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. New York.

11. Fromm, E. (1991). On being human. London: Bloomsbury Academic & Professional.

12. Jung, C. G. (1972). Two essays on analytical psychology. Princeton, NJ.

13. Kelly, E. (2011). Material Ethics of Value: Max Scheler and Nicolai Hartmann. Springer Science &

Business Media.

14. Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in

the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science. Vol. 3. P. 184–256. New York.

15. Rogers, C. R. (1965). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston.

16. Rogers, C. R. (1995). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view on psychotherapy. Boston

Published

2025-08-07