Теорія і практика пошуку талантів
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32405/2413-4139-2020-1(28)-59-69Ключові слова:
обдарованість, талант, освітні програми, додаткові освітні послуги, прискорене навчання, збагачене навчанняАнотація
У статті розглянуто теорія і практика пошуку обдарованої молоді, програми для розвитку талантів обдарованих індивідів, які викладені в працях англомовних дослідників. Проаналізовано як індивідуальні приклади, так і результати багаторічних масштабних досліджень.
Кількість завантажень статті
Посилання
1. Ybarra, L. (2005). Beyond national borders: the Johns Hopkins University Center for Talented Youth
reaching out to gifted children from throughout the world. High Ability Studies. Vol. 16. No 1. P. 15–26.
2. Lee, S.-Y., Matthews, M. S., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. A. (2008). National Picture of Talent Search
and Talent Search Educational Programs. Gifted Child Quarterly. Vol. 52. No.1. P. 55–69.
3. Barnett, L. B., Albert, M. E., & Brody, L. E. (2005). The Center for Talented Youth talent search and
academic programs. High Ability Studies. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 27–40.
4. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. E., & Assouline, S. G. (1993). Identifying Mathematically Talented El
ementary Students: Using the Lower Level of the SSAT. Gifted Child Quarterly. Vol. 37. No. 3. P.118–123.
5. Swiatek, M. A. (2007). The Talent Search Model. Past, Present, and Future. Gifted Child Quarterly.
Vol. 51. No.4. P. 320–329.
6. Brody, L. E., & Mills, C. J. 2005. Talent search research: what have we learned? High Ability
Studies. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 97–111.
7. Putallaz, M., Baldwin, J., & Selph, H. (2005). The Duke University Talent Identification Program.
High Ability Studies. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 41–54.
8. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2005). The Center for Talent Development at Northwestern University: an
example of replication and reformation. High Ability Studies. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 55–69.
9. Rigby, K. (2005). ‘Rocky Mountain Talent Search’ at the University of Denver. High Ability Studies.
Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 71–75.
10. Arancibia, V., Lissi, M. R., & Narea, M. (2008). Impact in the school system of a strategy for
identifying and selecting academically talented students: the experience of Program PENTA-UC. High
Ability Studies. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 53–65.
11. Brody, L. E. (2005). The Study of Exceptional Talent. High Ability Studies. Vol. 16. No. 1.
P. 87–96.
12. Hartas, D., Lindsay, G., & Muijs, D. (2008). Identifying and selecting able students for the NAGTY
summer school: emerging issues and future considerations. High Ability Studies. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 5–18.
13. Saxon, J. A., Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., & Wittig, C. V. (2003). Camp Invention: A Creative,
Inquiry-Based Summer Enrichment Program for Elementary Students. The Journal of Creative Behavior.
Vol. 37. No. 1. P. 64–74.
14. Matthews, M. S., & McBee, M. T. (2007). School Factors and the Underachievement of Gifted
Students in a Talent Search Summer Program. Gifted Child Quarterly. Vol. 51. No. 2. P. 167–181.
15. Linn-Cohen, R., & Hertzog, N. B. (2007). Unlocking the GATE to Differentiation: A Qualitative
Study of Two Self-Contained Gifted Classes. JEG. Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 227–259.
16. Feldhusen, J. F., Asher, J. W., & Hoover, S. M. (1984). Problems in the Identification of Giftedness,
Talent, or Ability. Gifted Child Quarterly. Vol. 28. No. 4. P. 149–151.
17. Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical,
practical, and creative skills. Intelligence. Vol. 34. No. 4. P. 321–350.
18. Male, R. A., & Perrone, Ph. (1980). Identifying Talent and Giftedness. Part II. Roeper Review.
Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 9–11.
19. Brown, C. N. (1997). Gifted Identification as a Constitutional Issue. Roeper Review. Vol. 19. No.
3. P. 157–160.
20. Sarouphim, K. M. (2001). DISCOVER: Concurrent Validity, Gender Differences, and Identification
of Minority Students. Gifted Child Quarterly. Vol. 45. No. 2. P. 130–138.
21. Reed, C. F. (2007). We Can Identify and Serve ESOL GATE Students: A Case Study. GCT. Vol. 30.
No. 2. P. 16–22.
22. Ford, D. Y., & Harmon, D. A. (2001). Equity and Excellence: Providing Access to Gifted Education
for Culturally Diverse. JSGE. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 141–146.
23. Visually Talented Students: A National Search (1985). School Arts. Vol. 85. No. 2. P. 44–45.
24. Richardson, C. P. (1990). Measuring Musical Giftedness. Music Educators Journal. Vol. 76. No.
7. P. 40–45.
25. Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (2001). Identifying Artistically Talented Students in Four Rural
Communities in the United States. Gifted Child Quarterly. Vol. 45. No. 2. P. 104–114.
26. Pledgie, Th. K. (1982). Giftedness among Handicapped Children: Identification and Programming
Development. Journal of Special Education. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 221–227.
27. Swiatek, M. A., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2005). An Evaluation of the Elementary Student Talent
Search by Families and Schools. Gifted Child Quarterly. Vol. 49. No. 3. P. 247–259.
28. Naglieri, J. A., & Ford, D. Y. (2005). Increasing Minority Children’s Participation in Gifted Classes
Using the NNAT: A Response to Lohman. Gifted Child Quarterly. Vol. 49. No. 1. P. 29–36.
29. Adey Ph. (1991). Pulling yourself up by your own thinking. High Ability Studies. Vol. 2. No. P. 28–34.
30. Feldman, D. (1979). Toward a Nonelitist Conception of Giftedness. Phi Delta Kappan. Vol. 60. No.
9. P. 660–663.
31. Hargrove, K. (2008). From the Classroom: Meeting Social and Emotional Needs in the Days of High
Stakes Testing. GCT. Vol. 31. No. 3. P. 45–46.
