Development of Gifted Children in the Modern Educational Environment: Psychological and Pedagogical Aspects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63437/3083-6433-2026-1(36)-16Keywords:
intellectual potential, creative abilities, individualized educational trajectory, differentiated learning, psychological and pedagogical support, educational environmentAbstract
The study investigates the psychological and pedagogical foundations for the development of children with high intellectual and creative potential in the contemporary educational space. It analyzes scientific approaches to the phenomenon of giftedness, identifies the characteristics of cognitive and personal development of such students, and examines the factors that influence the realization of their abilities. The paper substantiates the pedagogical conditions for effective support of students’ intellectual and creative potential, including individualized learning, the use of research-based methods, and the creation of a stimulating educational environment.
Special attention is given to the role of the teacher as a key facilitator of psychological and pedagogical support, ensuring favorable conditions for self-realization and personal growth. The study emphasizes that the development of gifted students requires an integrated approach that combines cognitive stimulation, creative activity, emotional support, and social interaction. It also highlights the importance of motivating learners, fostering autonomy in knowledge acquisition, and providing opportunities for project-based and research-oriented activities.
By analyzing both theoretical frameworks and practical approaches, the research demonstrates that a supportive and well-structured educational environment is essential for nurturing intellectual and creative abilities. The findings provide valuable insights for educators, school administrators, and policymakers who aim to implement effective strategies for developing gifted students within modern educational systems.
Downloads
References
Використані літературні джерела
1. Про освіту: Закон України від 5 верес. 2017 р. № 2145-VIII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text.
2. Поліхун Н. І., Постова К. Г., Сліпухіна І. А. Упровадження STEM-освіти в умовах інтеграції формальної і неформальної освіти обдарованих учнів. Київ, 2019.
3. Волощук І. С., Шепотько В. П. Організація навчання обдарованих і талановитих школярів. Рідна школа. 2006. № 2. С. 27–54.
4. National Research Council. National Science Education Standards. Washington: National Academies Press, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/4962.
5. Sternberg R. J. Giftedness as developing expertise. High Ability Studies. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2018.1516970.
6. Subotnik R., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Worrell F. Rethinking giftedness. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056.
7. Renzulli J. S. The Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness: A Developmental Model For Promoting Creative Productivity. Gifted Child Quarterly. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.015.
8. Tomlinson C. A. Differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119183014.
9. Hattie J. Visible Learning. London: Routledge, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332.
10. VanTassel-Baska J., Brown E. F. Toward Best Practice: An Analysis of the Efficacy of Curriculum Models in Gifted Education. Gifted Child Quarterly. 2007. Vol. 51, Issue 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207306323
11. Maker C.J., Schiever S.W. Teaching models in education of the gifted. Third Edition. PRO-ED, Inc., 2005. 505 p.
12. Pfeiffer S. I. Serving the gifted. Routledge, 2013. 245 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883587
13. Gagné F. The Differentiated Model of Giftedness and Talent. Systems and Models for Developing Programs for the Gifted and Talented. 2023. P. 165–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003419426-7.
14. Education at a Glance 2023. OECD. Paris, 2023. URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/education-at-a-glance-2023_e13bef63-en.html.
15. Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. European Commission. 2019. URL: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/297a33c8-a1f3-11e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
References
1. (2017). Pro osvitu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 5 veresnia 2017 r. № 2145-VIII [On Education: Law of Ukraine of September 5, 2017, No. 2145-VIII]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text. [in Ukrainian].
2. Polikhun, N. I., Postova, K. H., & Slipukhina, I. A. (2019). Uprovadzhennia STEM-osvity v umovakh intehratsii formalnoi i neformalnoi osvity obdarovanykh uchniv [Implementation of STEM education in conditions of integration of formal and informal education of gifted students]. Kyiv. 80 p. [in Ukrainian].
3. Voloshchuk, I. S., & Shepotko, V. P. (2006). Orhanizatsiia navchannia obdarovanykh i talanovytykh shkoliariv [Organization of education of gifted and talented schoolchildren]. Kyiv. 28 p. Ridna shkola – Native School, (2), 27-54. [in Ukrainian].
4. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington. 272 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/4962.
5. Sternberg, R. J. (2018). Giftedness as developing expertise. London. 13 p. High Ability Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2018.1516970.
6. Subotnik, R., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. (2011). Rethinking giftedness. Washington. 40 p. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056.
7. Renzulli, J. S. (2016). The Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness: A Developmental Model For Promoting Creative Productivity. Connecticut. 35 p. Gifted Child Quarterly. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.015.
8. Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). Differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119183014.
9. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning. London. 392 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332.
10. VanTassel-Baska, J., & Brown, E. F. (2007). Toward Best Practice: An Analysis of the Efficacy of Curriculum Models in Gifted Education. Connecticut. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207306323.
11. Maker, C. J., & Schiever, S. W. (2005). Teaching models in education of the gifted. Austin. 505 p.
12. Pfeiffer, S. I. (2013). Serving the gifted. London. 245 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883587.
13. Gagné, F. (2023). The Differentiated Model of Giftedness and Talent. Systems and Models for Developing Programs for the Gifted and Talented, 165-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003419426-7.
14. (2023). Education at a Glance 2023. OECD. Paris. 500 p. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/education-at-a-glance-2023_e13bef63-en.html.
15. (2019). Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. European Commission. Brussels. 16 p. Retrieved from: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/297a33c8-a1f3-11e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
