Development of Critical Thinking in Secondary School Students through STEM Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63437/3083-6433-2026-1(36)-14

Keywords:

critical thinking, STEM methods, engineering design, project-based learning, data analysis, error-based cases, research mini-experiments, students, general secondary education institutions, pedagogical experiment

Abstract

The article presents the analysis, synthesis, generalization, and systematization of scientific sources regarding the formation of critical thinking and the implementation of STEM education in general secondary education institutions. A comparative analysis of approaches to interpreting critical thinking made it possible to distinguish its cognitive and dispositional components and to substantiate the need for their comprehensive assessment. Structural and functional analysis was applied to determine the correspondence between specific STEM methods and particular components of critical thinking. The main empirical method was a pedagogical experiment consisting of diagnostic and formative stages.

The diagnostic stage involved the primary assessment of critical thinking levels among 10th-grade students aged 15–16 using adapted instruments: the Watson–Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal, which assesses cognitive skills such as interpretation, analysis, evaluation of arguments, and logical conclusions; and the UF/EMI-CTDI questionnaire, which assesses dispositions such as Engagement, Maturity, and Innovativeness. The adaptation of these tools considered the age characteristics of senior high school students: simplification of wording, contextualization of examples within school life and STEM practices, and expert validation of content.

For the formative stage, the systematic implementation of a set of STEM methods – engineering design, Problem-Based Learning, Data Literacy, error-based learning, and research mini-experiments – was proposed for implementation in the educational process of the experimental group over one academic semester. The control group followed traditional teaching methods. To record changes, a pre-test/post-test design was used, alongside pedagogical observation, analysis of student work products, including projects, prototypes, research reports, and analytical works, expert evaluation of the reasoning, logic, and evidence-based nature of student decisions, and surveys regarding attitudes toward learning and complex problem-solving tasks.

The research results indicate that the systematic implementation of STEM methods in 10th-grade education contributes not only to the development of specific cognitive skills but also to the formation of a stable disposition toward critical thinking. The combination of activity-based, research, and engineering formats creates pedagogical conditions for the transition from the situational use of logical operations to an integrated intellectual position, which is a key characteristic of a mature personality in the modern information society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Використані літературні джерела

1. Пометун О. Критичне мислення як педагогічний феномен. Український педагогічний журнал. 2018. № 2. С. 89–98.

2. Лякішева А., Вітюк В., Кашуб’як І. Ретроспективний огляд поняття «критичне мислення». Педагогічні інновації: ідеї, реалії, перспективи. 2019. № 1. С. 26–32. DОI: https://doi.org/10.32405/2413-4139-2019-1-29-37.

3. Саух П. Ю. Розвиток критичного мислення як провідний тренд сучасного освітнього процесу. Неперервна професійна освіта: теорія і практика. Серія: Педагогічні науки. 2021. № 2. С. 7–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2021.2.1.

4. Рогоза В., Левченко Ф., Калініна Л., Засєкіна Т., Скуловатов О. Впровадження STEM-освіти в рамках реформи «Нової української школи». Науковий вісник Ужгородського університету. Серія: Фізика. 2024. № 55. С. 2064–2073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.206er4.

5. Засєкіна Т. М. Про результати досліджень проблем STEM-освіти в гімназіях і ліцеях у відділенні загальної середньої освіти і цифровізації освітніх систем НАПН України. Вісник Національної академії педагогічних наук України. 2025. Т. 7. № 1. С. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37472/v.naes.2025.7141.

6. Хебебджі М. Т., Уста Е. Вплив інтегрованих практик STEM-освіти на навички вирішення проблем, наукову креативність та критичне мислення. Participatory Educational Research. 2022. Vol. 9. No. 6. P. 358–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.143.9.6.

7. Pratiwi A. N., Aisyah N., Somakim, Kamran M. STEM-based approach: A learning design to improve critical thinking skills. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. Bandar Lampung. 2023. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 225–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v14i1.18054.

References

1. Pometun, O. (2018). Krytychne myslennia yak pedahohichnyi fenomen [Critical thinking as a pedagogical phenomenon]. Ukrainskyi pedahohichnyi zhurnal – Ukrainian Educational Journal, 2, 89-98 [in Ukrainian].

2. Liakisheva, A., Vitiuk, V., & Kashubiak, I. (2019). Retrospektyvnyi ohliad poniattia «krytychne myslennia» [A retrospective review of the concept of "critical thinking"]. Pedahohichni innovatsii: idei, realii, perspektyvy – Pedagogical Innovations: Ideas, Realities, Perspectives, 1, 26-32. DОI: https://doi.org/10.32405/2413-4139-2019-1-29-37 [in Ukrainian].

3. Saukh, P. Yu. (2021). Rozvytok krytychnoho myslennia yak providnyi trend suchasnoho osvitnoho protsesu [Development of critical thinking as a leading trend in the modern educational process]. Neperervna profesiina osvita: teoriia i praktyka – Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, 2, 7-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2021.2.1. [in Ukrainian].

4. Rohoza, V., Levchenko, F., Kalinina, L., Zasiekina, T., & Skulovatov, O. (2024). Vprovadzhennia STEM-osvity v ramkakh reformy «Novoi ukrainskoi shkoly» [Implementation of STEM education within the framework of the "New Ukrainian School" reform]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu. Seriia: Fizyka – Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series: Physics, 55, 2064-2073. https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.206er4 [in Ukrainian]

5. Zasiekina, T. M. (2025). Pro rezultaty doslidzhen problem STEM-osvity v himnaziiakh i litseiah u viddilenni zahalnoi serednoi osvity i tsyfrovizatsii osvitnikh lytseiv NAPN Ukrainy [On the results of research on STEM education problems in gymnasiums and lyceums]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pedahohichnykh nauk Ukrainy – Herald of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, 7(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.37472/v.naes.2025.7141 [in Ukrainian]

6. Khebebdzhi, M. T., & Usta, E. (2022). Vplyv intehrovanykh praktyk STEM-osvity na navychky vyrishennia problem, naukovu kreatyvnist ta krytychne myslennia [The effect of integrated STEM education practices on problem-solving skills, scientific creativity, and critical thinking]. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 358-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.143.9.6 [in Ukrainian]

7. Pratiwi, A. N., Aisyah, N., Somakim, & Kamran, M. (2023). STEM-based approach: A learning design to improve critical thinking skills. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 225-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v14i1.18054.

Published

2026-05-31