Trust and Education in the Parameters of Changing World

Authors

  • Ільїна Ilyina Author
  • Mykola Lipin Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32405/2413-4139-2021-2(27)-118-124

Keywords:

trust, culture of distrust, social reflexivity, education, teacher, changing world

Abstract

The article examines the phenomenon of trust as the basis of socio-economic relations in a changing and 
complex world. The role of trust in the educational space, its involvement in the constitution of the semantic 
dimensions of teaching and education is revealed. The article outlines preconditions for building a trusting 
relationship between a child and an adult as a defining marker of a teacher's professionalism. The author 
analyses the essence of the phenomenon of trust in the educational process in its relation to the demand of 
modernity in reflective, critical and creative thinking, based on a culture of distrust.
 The study of the problem of trust in the educational space generates the need to refer to its communicative 
parameters. Reflective rather than blind trust presupposes mutual understanding, which arises in the process 
of communication. It’s not just the fullness of the individual that is manifested in communication, it represents 
the transforming power of the community. On this basis, training and education can be understood as specific 
forms of communication.
 The formation of impersonal trust in a changing world does not exclude the presence of the individual, but 
on the contrary, increases its importance and responsibility. The contradiction between trust and distrust can 
only be resolved through personal effort and critical reflection. Long-term social relationships are impossible 
without trust, which in turn requires a reflexive analysis of sustainable ways of interpersonal interaction and 
the constitution of common meaning. It should be noted that the presence of meaning by definition is asserted 
as a personal act, because without personality there can be no meaning.
 A prerequisite for reproducing the meaning of education is the ability to overcome the inertia of habitual 
patterns of reasoning, practice and cognition and return to the beginning of thinking and acting, to such 
a creative way of human existence as an open opportunity. In this case, the productivity and duration of 
intersubjective interaction and communication on the reproduction and renewal of the universal meanings 
of culture is manifested in teaching and education, provided that each participant in the educational process. 
Trust in this case loses its dogmatic imperative and is complemented by the work of critical distrust. In this 
context, the educational community appears as a problem and a task, as a subject of attention, willpower, 
reflection and, finally, creative activity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Використані літературні джерела

1. Фукуяма Ф. Доверие: социальные добродетели и путь к процветанию : пер. с англ. / Ф. Фукуя

ма. – М. : ACT, 2004. – 730 с.

2. Wojcicki E. How to Raise Successful People : Simple Lessons for Radical Results / E. Wojcicki. –

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2019. – 336 р.

3. Сухомлинский В. А. Избранные произведения: в 5- ти т. Т. 5. Статьи. / В. А. Сухомлинский; ред

кол. : А. Г. Дзеверин (пред.) и др. – Kиев : Рад. школа, 1980. – 678 с.

4. Сухомлинский В. A. Избранные произведения: в 5- ти т. Т. 2. / В. A. Сухомлинский; редкол.:

А. Г. Дзеверин (пред.) и др. – Киев : Рад. школа, 1979. – 718 с.

5. Корчак Я. Избранные педагогические произведения / Я. Корчак; пер. с пол. К. Э. Сенкевич. –

М. : Педагогика, 1979. XXII. – 474 с.

6. Корчак Я. Як любити дитину / Я. Корчак; пер. з польс. О. Замойька. – Харків : Клуб сімейного

дозвілля, 2016. – 207 с.

7. Лотман Ю. М. Воспитание души : Воспоминания. Беседы. Интервью / Ю. М. Лотман. – СПб. :

Искусство- СПБ, 2003. – 621 с.

8. Штомпка П. Доверие – основа общества / П. Штомпка; пер. с пол. Н. В. Морозовой. – М. :

Логос, 2012. – 445 с.

9. Luhman N. Trust and Power / N. Luhman. – Chichester UK : John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1979. – 143 р.

10. Ліпін М. Смисли освіти в параметрах нігілізму / М. Ліпін // Людинознавчі студії. – 2020. –

Вип. 40. – С. 77–94. (Серія: Філософія).

11. Арендт X. Між минулим і майбутнім / X. Арендт ; пер. з англ. – Киев : Дух і літера, 2002. – 321 с.

12. Reckwitz A. The creativity dispositif and the social regimes of the new / A. Reckwitz // Innovation

society today. – Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2018. – С. 127–145.

13. Eriksen T. H. Tyranny of the moment: Fast and slow time in the information age / T. H.. Eriksen –

London : Pluto Press, 2001. – 192 р.

14. Slimbach R. The transcultural journey / R. Slimbach // Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of

Study Abroad. – 2005. – Т. 11. – № 1. – С. 205–230.

15. Горбунова Л. Транскультурна компетентність: освітній шлях до глобальної культури миру /

Л. Горбунова // Філософія освіти. – 2014. – № 2. – С. 141–167.

16. Кремень В. Інноваційна людина як мета сучасної освіти / В. Кремень // Philosophy of education. –

2013. – № 1. – С. 7–22.

17. Общество без доверия / под ред. Е. Головахи, Н. Костенко, С. Макеева. – Киев : Институт со

циологи НАН Украины, 2014. – 338 с.

18. Гидденс Э. Социология / Э. Гидденс; при участии К. Бердсолл; пер. с ан гл. Изд. 2- е, пол

ностью перераб. и доп. – М. : Едиториал УРСС, 2005. – 632 с.

References

1. Fukuyama, F. (2004). Doverye: sotsyаlnye dobrodetely y put k protsvetаnyiu [Trust: social virtues and

the path to prosperity]. Moscow. 730, [6] p. [in Russian].

2. Wojcicki, E. (2019). How to Raise Successful People: Simple Lessons for Radical Results. Houghton

Mifflin Harcourt. 336 p.

3. Sukhomlinsky, V. A. (1980). Yzbrаnnye proyzvedenyia: V 5- ty t. T. 5. Stаty. [Selected works: In 5

volumes. V. 5. Articles]. Kyiv. 678 p. [in Russian].

4. Sukhomlinsky, V. A. (1979). Yzbrаnnye proyzvedenyia: V 5- ty t. T. 2. [Selected works: In 5 v. V. 2].

Kyiv. 718 p. [in Russian].

5. Korczak, J. (1979). Yzbrаnnye pedаhohycheskye proyzvedenyia. [Selected pedagogical works].

(K. E. Senkevich, Trans.). Moscow. XXII. 474 p. [in Russian].

6. Korchak, Ya. (2016). Yak liubyty dytynu. [How to love a child]. (O. Zamoyka, Trans.). Kharkiv. 207 p.

[in Ukrainian].

7. Lotman, Yu. M. (2003). Vospytаnye dushy : Vospomynаnyia. Besedy. Ynterviu. [Education of the soul:

Memories. Conversations. Interview]. St. Petersburg. 621 p. [in Russian].

8. Shtompka, P. (2013). Doverye - osnovа obshchestvа. [Trust is the foundation of society]. Moscow.

445 p. [in Russian].

9. Luhman, N. (1979). Trust and Power. Chichester UK.143 p.

10. Lipin, M. (2020). Smysly osvity v pаrаmetrаkh nihilizmu. [The meanings of education in the parameters

of nihilism]. Liudynoznаvchi studii. Seriia: Filosofiia. – Anthropological studies. Series: Philosophy. 40. P. 77

94. [in Ukrainian]

11. Arendt, H. (2002). Mizh mynulym i mаibutnim. [Between past and future]. Kyiv. 321 p. [in Ukrainian].

12. Reckwitz, A. (2018). The creativity dispositif and the social regimes of the new. Innovation society

today. Wiesbaden. P. 127–145.

13. Eriksen, T. H. (2019). Tyranny of the moment: Fast and slow time in the information age. London.192 p.

14. Slimbach, R. (2005). The transcultural journey. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study

Abroad. 11(1). P. 205–230.

15. Gorbunova, L. (2014). Trаnskulturnа kompetentnist: osvitnii shliakh do hlobаlnoi kultury myru.

[Transcultural Competence: Holy Way to the Global Culture of the World]. Filosofiya osvity – Philosophy of

Education. 2. P. 141–167. [in Ukrainian].

16. Kremen, V. (2013). Innovаtsiinа liudynа yak metа suchаsnoi osvity. [Innovative man as the goal of

modern education.]. Philosophy of education. 1. P. 7–22. [in Ukrainian].

17. Holovаkhy, E. Kostenko, N. Mаkeevа, S. (Eds.). (2014). Obshchestvo bez doveryia [A society without

trust]. Kyiv. 338 p. [in Russian].

18. Giddens, E. (2005). Sotsyolohyia [Sociology]. Ed. 2nd. (N. Shmatko, Trans.). Moscow. 632 p. [in Russian].

Published

2025-08-16