Lesson Simulation in Primary School: a Retrospective Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32405/2413-4139-2021-2(27)-76-81Keywords:
lesson, lesson modeling, primary school students, teacher's pedagogical skillsAbstract
The article covers theoretical issues of the problem of modeling a lesson in primary school. Based on the
analysis of scientific, methodical and encyclopedic literature, the authors carried out a retrospective analysis
of the researched problem and revealed the essential characteristics of the concepts “model”, “modeling”,
“lesson model”, “lesson modeling”. It is noted that the concepts of “lesson modeling” and “lesson design”
have long been used by scientists as synonyms and just recently they began to distinguish them.
In the system of general secondary education, one of the main places is occupied by primary school,
where the foundation of mental, moral and emotional-volitional qualities is laid. The school becomes not
so much a source of information as a place where students learn, and the teacher is not an informant or a
conductor of knowledge, but a person who creates conditions for learning ways of creative activity aimed at
self- acquisition and acquisition of new knowledge. The tendencies of the modern educational process actualize
some forms of behavior and methodical methods of the teacher were desirable, but not obligatory ones. The
goals and content of education, requirements for results are changing; new technical means and technologies
of teaching appear, and the lesson remains the main didactic unit of the educational process, which should
ensure the development of qualities of a primary school graduate that meet the requirements of modern society.
The lesson is a part of the life of a primary school student and a teacher, whose residence should demonstrate
a high universal culture, ensure the formation of value orientations.
The regulations of the New Ukrainian School state that the main focus is on how to organize the activities
of primary school students in the classroom to achieve personal results, development of talents and abilities,
competencies and cross-cutting skills according to their age and individual characteristics.
It is proved that for high-quality professional training of a future teacher to model a lesson in primary
school it is required: general didactic knowledge of laws, principles, main categories, the essence of the
educational process, content, structure, possible forms and methods of its organization; didactic and methodical skills to design lessons in primary school; developed ability to reflexive activity; pedagogical skills. Lesson
modeling will allow the teacher to effectively use the opportunities of each form of learning, choose their
combinations that will ensure high efficiency of educational activities of all students.
Downloads
References
Використані літературні джерела
1. Бабанський Ю. К. Оптимизация процесса обучения / Ю. К. Бабанський. – М. : Педагогика,
1977. – 257 с.
2. Данилов М. А. Процесс обучения в советской школе / М. А. Данилов. – М. : Учпедгиз, 1960.
299 с.
3. Енциклопедія освіти / гол. ред. В. Г. Кремень. – Київ : Юрінком Інтер, 2008. – 1040 с.
4. Есипов Б. П. Урок в начальной школе: элементарная дидактика / Б. П. Есипов. – М. : Учпедгиз,
1944. – 79 с.
5. Золотарева С. А. Развитие теории урока в советской дидактике периода середины 50- х – сере
дины 60- х годов: дис. … канд. пед. наук: 13.00.01 / С. А. Золотарева. – Хабаровск, 1998. – 236 с.
6. Иванов С. В. Типы и структуры урока / С. В. Иванов. – М. : Учпедгиз, 1952. – 152 с.
7. Концепція Нової української школи. – URL: www.kmu.gov.ua/storage/app/media/reforms/
ukrainska- shkola- compressed.pdf.
8. Кучерук О. А. Моделювання як структурний елемент проектування сучасного уроку української
мови / О. А. Кучерук // Українська мова і література в школі. – 2014. – № 5. – С. 6–10.
9. Лысенкова С. Н. Когда легко учиться: из опыта работы учителя начальных классов московской
школы / С. Н. Лысенкова. – М. : Педагогика, 1985. – 176 с.
10. Логачевська С. П. Диференціація у звичайному класі: посібник для вчителів, методистів, сту
дентів / С. П. Логачевська. – Донецьк : Центр підготовки абітурієнтів, 1998. – 288 с.
11. Нестеренко М. М. Моделювальна компетентність як орієнтир і результат підготовки майбут
ніх учителів до моделювання уроку в умовах варіативності початкової освіти / М. М. Нестеренко //
Педагогічні науки: зб. наук. пр. – 2019. – Вип. LXXXVІ. – С. 465–469.
12. Онищук В. А. Урок в современной школе: пособие для учителей / В. А. Онищук. – М. : Просве
щение, 1981. – 191 с.
13. Савченко О. Я. Дидактика початкової освіти: підручник / О. Я. Савченко. – Київ : Грамота,
2012. 504 с.
14. Скаткин М. Н. Современный урок / М. Н. Скаткин, И. Я. Лернер // Народное образование.
1985. – № 1. – С. 14–18.
15. Словник
іншомовних
pl?Qry=%CC%EE%E4%E5%EB%FC.
слів. –
URL:
https://www.jnsm.com.ua/cgibin/u/book/sis.
16. Сухомлинский В. А. Избранные педагогические сочинения: в 3- х т. / сост. О. С. Богданова,
В. З. Смаль. – М. : Педагогика, 1979. – Т. 2. – 560 с.
17. Ушинський К. Д. Твори: в 6 т. / К. Д. Ушинський. – Київ : Радя. шк., 1952.
18. Философский энциклопедический словарь / ред. кол: С. С. Аверинцев, Э. А. Араб- Оглы,
Л. Ф. Ильичев и др. 2- е изд. – М. : Сов. Энциклопедия, 1989. – 815 с.
References
1. Babanskiy, Yu. K. (1977). Optimizatsiya protsessa obucheniya [Optimization of the learning process].
Moscow. [in Russian].
2. Danilov, M. A. (1960). Protsess obucheniya v sovetskoy shkole [The learning process in the Soviet
school]. Moscow. [in Russian].
3. Kremen, V. H. (Ed.). (2008). Entsyklopediia osvity [Encyclopedia of Education]. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
4. Esipov, B. P. (1944). Urok v nachalnoy shkole: elementarnaya didaktika [Lesson in elementary school:
elementary didactics]. Moscow. [in Russian].
5. Zolotareva, S. A. (1998). Razvitiye teorii uroka v sovetskoy didaktike perioda serediny 50- kh
serediny 60- kh godov [Development of lesson theory in Soviet didactics in the mid- 50s - mid- 60s]. (Candidate
of pedagogical sciences dissertation). Khabarovsk. [in Ukrainian].
6. Ivanov, S. V. (1952). Tipy i struktury uroka [Lesson types and structures]. Moscow. [in Russian].
7. Kontseptsiia Novoi ukrаinskoi shkoly [The concept of the New Ukrainian School]. Retrieved from
www.kmu.gov.ua/storage/ app/media/reforms/ukrainska- shkola- compressed.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
8. Kucheruk, O. A. (2014). Modeliuvаnnia yak strukturnyi element proektuvаnnia suchаsnoho uroku
ukrаinskoi movy [Modeling as a structural element of designing a modern Ukrainian language lesson].
Ukrainian language and literature at school, 5, P. 6–10. [in Ukrainian].
9. Lysenkova, S. N. (1985). Kogda legko uchitsya: iz opyta raboty uchitelya nachalnykh klassov
moskovskoy shkoly [When it’s easy to learn: from the experience of a primary school teacher in a Moscow
school]. Moscow. [in Russian].
10. Lohаchevskа, S. P. (1998). Dyferentsiаtsiia u zvychаinomu klаsi [Differentiation in the regular class].
Donetsk: Tsentr pidhotovky аbituriientiv. [in Ukrainian].
11. Nesterenko, M. M. (2019). Modeliuvаlnа kompetentnist yak oriientyr i rezultаt pidhotovky mаibutnikh
uchyteliv do modeliuvаnnia uroku v umovаkh vаriаtyvnosti pochаtkovoi osvity [Modeling competence as a
guideline and the result of preparing future teachers to model a lesson in the conditions of variability of primary
education]. Pedagogical sciences, LXXXVІ, P. 465–469. [in Ukrainian].
12. Onishchuk, V. A. (1981). Urok v sovremennoy shkole [Lesson in a modern school]. Moscow. [in Russian].
13. Sаvchenko, O. Ya. (2012). Dydаktykа pochаtkovoi osvity [Didactics of primary education]. Kyiv. [in
Ukrainian].
14. Skatkin, M. N., & Lerner, I. Ya. (1985). Sovremennyy urok [Modern lesson]. Public education, 1,
P. 14–18. [in Russian].
15. Slovnyk inshomovnykh sliv [Dictionary of foreign words]. Retrieved from https://www.jnsm.com.ua/
cgibin/u/book/sis.pl?Qry=%CC%EE% E4%E5%EB%FC. [in Ukrainian].
16. Sukhomlinskiy, V. A.; Bogdanova, O. S. and Smal, V. Z. (Comp.). (1979). Izbrannyye pedagogicheskiye
sochineniya: v 3- kh t. Т. 2. [Selected pedagogical works: in 3 volumes V. 2]. Moscow. [in Russian].
17. Ushynskyi, K. D. (1952). Tvory: v 6 t. [Works: in 6 volumes]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
18. Averintsev, S. S. Arab- Ogly, E. A., Ilichev, L. F. et al. (Eds.). (1989). Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy
slovar [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. 2- e izd. Moscow. [in Russian].
