Discourse of Knowledge in Reflections of Cognitive Complexity – from Truth to Value

Authors

  • Nataliia Savchuk Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32405/2413-4139-2020-1(28)-32-36

Keywords:

knowledge, science, complex thinking, cognition

Abstract

The article analyzes the problem of knowledge, the growth of which has led to the progress of society. It is 
emphasized that in the epistemological context, knowledge is the result of practical experience and research that combines cognitive processes with socio- cultural structure. It is noted that to understand the development of modern knowledge it is important to consider the concept of cognitive complexity, which means the influence of mental structures on the formation of images of perception, interaction of cognitive agent and its environment, 
activity and cognition. It is determined that the approach to the study of complex systems in the context of 
cognitive complexity opens up creative possibilities of synergetic effects. It is shown that true knowledge is 
adequate to complex thinking, which helps to understand first of all the socio- economic and cultural reality. 
The formation and development of complex thinking returns knowledge to its semantic essence. The analysis 
showed that the modern vector of science development involves the dialogue of natural and socio- humanitarian subcultures within the body of scientific knowledge, as well as the dialogue of science as a special subsystem of culture and society with different value systems. Based on this, the fundamental role of the subject in the construction and structuring of knowledge and discourse, the appeal to another subject as its equal interpreter and co-author. It is shown that the dialogical principle is to establish an additional, competitive relationship between the two opposites. It is emphasized that for modern epistemology, the difference between the natural sciences and the socio-humanitarian type of research is determined not so much by the object as by the cognitive attitudes of the scientist in relation to him.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Harari, Yu. N. (2018). 21 urok dlia 21 stolittia [21 lessons for the 21st century]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

2. Scheler, M. (1985). Die Wissensformen und die Gesellschaft: Probleme einer Soziologie des Wissens.

Gesammelte Werke. Bern; München, Bd. 8.

3. Bazilevich, V. D., & Il’in, V. V. (2022). Ekonomichne znannia v refleksiiakh suchasnoi epistemolohii

[Economic knowledge in the reflections of modern epistemology]. Ekonomichnyi rozvytok Ukrainy: kontseptualni

zasady ta instytutsiinyi vymir – Economic development of Ukraine: conceptual principles and institutional

dimension, 15–33 [in Ukrainian].

4. Mainzer, K. (1994). Thinking in Complexity: The Complex Dynamics of Matter, Mind and Mankind.

Berlin, New York: Springer- Verlag.

5. Morin, E. (1994). Mes Demous. Paris: Stock.

6. Gorbunova, L. S. (2011). Skladnisne myslennia yak vidpovid na vyklyk epokhy [Complex thinking

in response to the challenge of the age]. Filosofiia i metodolohiia rozvytku vyshchoi osvity Ukrainy v konteksti

yevrointehratsiinykh protsesiv – Philosophy and methodology of development of higher education in Ukraine

in the context of European integration processes, P. 35–50 [in Ukrainian].

7. McCloskey, D. (2015). Ritoryka ekonomycheskoi nauki [Rhetoric of economic science]. Moscow [in

Russian].

Published

2025-08-08