Creativity of Scientific Education in the Paradigm of the Phenomenon of Science

Authors

  • Maksym Halchenko Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32405/2413-4139-2020-1(28)-27-32

Keywords:

scientific education, knowledge, science, art

Abstract

The article analyzes the phenomenon of science as a system that results in knowledge. It is noted that the 
history of scientific knowledge can be meaningful and understood the best way in the theory of scientific education. Rational reconstruction of scientific education in the context of analysis of the development of science contributes to the study of factors of its forms and methods. It is emphasized that the knowledge is the objective side of science, and there is scientific activity – a self-variable of the scientist, his values, motivations, forms of 
communication and ways to solve problems on the subjective side. It is shown that scientific education, taking 
science as the example, is a form of professionalization and specialization of research activities. Thus, scientific 
education becomes universal, and its results go beyond local boundaries. As scientific knowledge is objectified 
in the subjects of culture and the results of production activities, so scientific education materializes its activi
ties in the development of creative thinking, changes in the hierarchy of forms of objectification of knowledge. It is determined that the creative nature of scientific education is expressed in the flow of innovations that destroy established forms of knowledge, put forward new ideas, theories, approaches to solving practical problems. 
Like every science, scientific education formulates its own concepts that are used in the analysis of the object of cognition and creation. It is underlined that the development of methodological research tools, which need to be constantly updated, improved and changed, plays an important role in the progress of scientific education. It is emphasized that the knowledge in scientific education is considered from a problematic point of view, becoming a condition for expanding the culture of creative thinking horizontally and vertically, corresponding to the challenges of the present day. The peculiarity of scientific education is its ability to form a creative personality capable of productively solving theoretical and practical life problems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Pinker, S. (2019). Prosvitnytstvo s’ohodni. Arhumenty na koryst’ rozumu, nauky ta prohresu [En

lightenment today. Arguments in favor of reason, science and progress]. Kyiv, 560 p. [in Ukrainian].

2. Mokir, Dzh. (2012). Dary Afiny. Istoricheskiye istoki ekonomiki znaniy [Gifts of Athena. Historical

origins of the knowledge economy]. Moscow, 408 p. [in Russian].

3. Popper, K. (1983). Realism and the aim of science. London: Routledge.

4. Proleyev, S. V. (2021). Vlada i suspil’stvo: postmoderna perspektyva [Power and society: a postmod

ern perspective]. Kyiv, 360 p. [in Ukrainian].

5. Shapin, Steven. (1994). The Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

6. Baumol, William J. (2002). The Free market Information Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of

Capitalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

7. Lukashevich, V. K. (2006). Filosofiya i metodologiya nauki [Philosophy and methodology of science].

Minsk, 320 p. [in Russian].

8. Easterlin, R. A. (1981). Why isn’t the whole world developed? Journal of Economic History, 41,

P. 1–19.

Published

2025-08-08