Formation of an the Active Civil Position of the Future Personality in the Process of National Education in Modern Ukranian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32405/2413-4139-2020-1(28)-7-14Keywords:
national education, personality, education, nation, national idea, civil position, activity, young generationAbstract
The article is devoted to the study of the role of national education in the formation of active citizens of
the Ukrainian state. Reforming the Ukrainian state is impossible without building a civil society and developing Ukrainian spirituality.
The article highlights the educational system as one of the main areas of education of youth of national
identity. At each stage of the educational process, it is necessary to pay great attention to national education in the formation of an active civil position of the future personality. In order to achieve the goal of national education and form a true citizen of Ukraine – a teacher must have a clear idea of what should be his pupil as a representative of independent Ukrainian society and what should be his civic position.
The teacher must create conditions for the formation and development of the national identity of the future
personality and be an example of an active citizen. Educating a well-developed active personality, it is necessary not to forget about the development of his individual abilities and talents, it should be a priority in educational work.
It was emphasized that the education system should have national characteristics. But national education
must pass through interaction with the cultural diversity of the universal – this is the basis for tolerant respect,
understanding and cooperation of different peoples of the world.
It is emphasized that self-education of the individual is an important specific form of national education.
The purpose of national education is specified through a system of educational tasks. The article considers and characterizes the principles and directions of national education in the formation of personal qualities of the young.
The education of an active citizen of Ukraine should create a holistic process of unity of the educational process based on the millennial history of Ukrainian heritage with the enrichment of various achievements of universal culture.
Downloads
References
1. Kanigin, Yu. (1996). Ukrainska mriia [Ukrainian dream]. Kуiv. Р. 73. [in Ukrainian].
2. Andrushhenko, V. P., Andrushhenko, T. V., & Savelyev, V. L. (2017). Tsinnisnyi dyskurs v osviti.
Konstytutsializatsiia osvitnoho prostoru Yevropy: aksiolohichnyi vymir [Value discourse in education.
Constitutionalization of the educational space of Europe: axiological dimension]. Kуiv. 464 р. [in
Ukrainian].
3. Pro osvitu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 5 veres. 2017 r. № 2145-VIII [On education: Law of Ukraine of
September 5. 2017 No. 2145-VIII]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text.
[in Ukrainian].
4. Natsionalna doktryna rozvytku osvity: zatv. Ukazom Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 17 kvit. 2002 r. №
347/2002. [National doctrine of education development: approved. Decree of the President of Ukraine
of April 17, 2002 № 347/2002]. Retrieved from: http://schoolchem.ho.ua/ZavKab/NormD/1_7_nac_
doktryna.pdf [in Ukrainian].
5. Sytnyk, G. P. (2004). Natsionalni tsinnosti yak osnova prohresyvnoho rozvytku osobystosti,
suspilstva i derzhavy [National values as the basis of progressive development of the individual, society
and state]. Visnyk NADU – Bulletin NADU. 2. Р. 369–374. [in Ukrainian].
6. Huberskyi, L. V., Andrushhenko, V. P. & Myhalchenko, M. I. (2005). Kultura. Ideolohiia.
Osobystist: Metodoloho-svitohliadnyi analiz [Culture. Ideology. Personality: Methodological and
ideological analysis]. Kуiv. 580 р. [in Ukrainian].
7. Ohneviuk, V. O. (2003). Osvita v systemi tsinnostei staloho liudskoho rozvytku [Education in the
system of values of sustainable human development]. Kуiv. Р. 478–480. [in Ukrainian].
8. Skurativskyi, V. A., Troshchynskyi, V. P., & Chukut, S. A. (2002.) Humanitarna polityka v Ukraini
[Humanitarian Policy in Ukraine]. Kуiv. 262 р
9. Ushynskyi, K. D. (1983). Pro narodnist u hromadskomu vykhovanni [On nationality in public
education]. Kуiv. T. 2. Р. 31–32. [in Ukrainian].
10. V. O. Sukhomlynskyi i suchasni problemy osobystisno zoriientovanoho vykhovannia [V.O.
Suomlinsky and modern problems of personality-oriented development]. All-Ukrainian scientific-practical.
conf. (Uman, 26 travnya 2000 r.). Kуiv. 130 р. [in Ukrainian].
11. Bogush, A. (2008). Doshkilne dytynstvo: yoho sohodennia i maibutnie [Preschool childhood:
its present and future]. Humanistychnyi visnyk DVNZ Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi derzhavnyi pedahohichnyi
universytet imeni Hryhoriia Skovorody – Pereyaslav-Khmelnytsky State Pedagogical University named
after Hryhoriy Skovoroda. Pereyaslav-Khmelnytsky.14. Р. 27–30. [in Ukrainian].
12. Stelmakhovych, M. G. (1997). Ukrainska narodna pedahohika [Ukrainian folk pedagogy].
Kуiv. 232 р. [in Ukrainian].
13. Andrushhenko, V., Goncharov, V., Molodychenko, & Panchenko, L. (2017). Tsinnisnyi dyskurs v
osviti. Kultura yak aksiolohichna matrytsia osvity [Value discourse in education. Culture as an axiological
matrix of education]. Kyiv. 303 р. [in Ukrainian].
14. Moroz, O. G., Padalka, O. S. & Yurchenko, V. I. (2003). Pedahohika i psykholohiia vyshchoi
shkoly [Pedagogy and psychology of higher school]. Kyiv. Р. 32–34. [in Ukrainian].
